Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03619
Original file (BC 2013 03619.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-03619
		
		COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO


________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be corrected to reflect his temporary duty (TDY) service in Thailand.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

As an Inflight Refueling Technician, he performed TDY in Southeast Asia at Utapeo and Takli Royal Thai Navy and Air Force Bases during the periods of 12 Sep 67 through 12 Nov 67 and 23 Feb 69 through 25 Apr 69. 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________ ______________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 27 May 55.  

According to the applicant’s airman performance report (APR), rendered for the period closing 14 Mar 68, he was involved in direct support of Southeast Asia operations as a combat crew member during the period 12 Sep 67 through 9 Nov 67. 

According to the applicant’s APR, rendered for the period closing 8 Aug 69, he completed a tour in SEA.

According to the applicant’s AF Form 7, Airman Military Record, the applicant performed two TDYs to SEA during the periods 12 Sep 67 through 9 Nov 67 and 23 Feb 69 through 23 Apr 69.

On 30 Jun 78, the applicant was released from active duty and retired, effective 1 Jul 78, and was credited with 24 years and 4 months of active service.  According to his DD Forms 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, he is entitled to the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM).

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPAPP reviewed the documentation submitted by the applicant and was unable to determine the exact location of the applicant’s foreign service in Southeast Asia, and recommends the board review the information provided by the applicant and determine if it warrants approving service in the Republic of Vietnam. 

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

He reiterates that he did not request a change to his service record for in-country duty in Vietnam.  However, after discovering the lack of correct information in his records, he would like a correction showing his TDY duty in Thailand (Exhibit E).

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case and are convinced that a preponderance of the evidence indicates that corrective action is warranted.  In this respect, we note the applicant’s AF Form 7, Airman Military Record, reflects the applicant performed two 60-day tours of temporary duty (TDY) in South East Asia (SEA) during the noted periods.  Furthermore, information from the Air Force Historical Research Agency indicates the applicant’s unit sent two KC-135 aircraft to SEA in September 1967 and February 1969, where they operated out of U-Tapao Royal Thai Naval Base and Takhli Royal Thai Air Force Base during periods that correspond with those reflected on the applicant’s AF Form 7.  Therefore, we we believe it appropriate to recommend his records be corrected as indicated below.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that he had boots-on-ground in the Republic of Thailand during the periods of 12 Sep 67 through 9 Nov 67, and 23 Feb 69 through 23 Apr 69.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-03619 in Executive Session on 10 Jun 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	

All members voted to correct the records as recommended.  The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-03619 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 22 Jul 13, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 11 Oct 13.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Jan 14.
	Exhibit E.  Letter, Applicant, dated 20 Jan 14, w/atchs.
	



                                   







Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05218

    Original file (BC 2012 05218.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP states that the Board should review the applicant’s records to see if Foreign Service other than what they were able to verify can be determined. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states that his AF Form 7, Airman Military Record reflects he was TDY from 28...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00108

    Original file (BC 2014 00108.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00108 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect: 1. His DD Form 214 should be corrected to reflect this period of time deployed to Thailand, as well as award of the AFOUA, the VSM w/P and the RVNGC w/V. No action required by the Board, as the applicant’s official...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02942

    Original file (BC-2012-02942.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02942 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that he received the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) for his service in Vietnam and Thailand. He spent over 20 total months in Thailand, Vietnam, and Okinawa in 1967, 1968, and 1969. The remaining relevant facts...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03738

    Original file (BC-2011-03738.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03738 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. DPSIDR states the applicant was awarded the Air Force Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) which is annotated on his DD Form 214. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04798

    Original file (BC-2011-04798.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04798 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect his award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM). DPSIDR indicates that the Directorate of Personnel Assignments (DPA)...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00026

    Original file (BC-2011-00026.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFPC/DPAPP verified the applicant served at Kadena Air Base (AB), Japan, from 20 Sep 67 to 22 Mar 68, for a total of six months and four days. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The documentation provided to date clearly shows flight time during both TDYs, in 67-68 and 68-69. Someone must know KC-135 crew chiefs flew with their aircraft on most missions at that time.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02674

    Original file (BC-2011-02674.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP cannot verify the applicant was TDY to Vietnam, nor verify that the author of the supporting statement provided with his submission was assigned with him at Clark AFB or in Vietnam. We note the comments of the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00054

    Original file (BC 2014 00054.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, personnel serving in Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia in direct support of operations in Vietnam during the same time period were also eligible for the VSM. A thorough review of the applicant’s official military record did not locate any documentation verifying award of the VSM. The applicant provided TDY Order-Military, dated 24 Jan 67 assigning him to the 4133rd Bomb Wing (Provisional), Anderson Air Force Base (AFB), Guam; TDY Order-military, dated 22 Feb 68, assigning him to the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04699

    Original file (BC-2012-04699.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His AF Form 7 states that he was TDY to SEA (Southeast Asia) for 85 days. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04686

    Original file (BC 2013 04686.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: His TDY to Southeast Asia was in Vietnam. Therefore, in view of the fact that applicant has provided a copy of travel orders that appear to substantiate the noted three-month deployment to Southeast Asia was in the Republic of Vietnam, we believe corrective action is warranted. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the...